There are players missing from the above list like my self
How sure are you about this for the beta??As long as there are 300+ active players on a WW world it will not close. The players decide when to make a world close, not the game itself
...and I have never read this player names here in the bug forum from Beta.
Instead of fighting us down to the last knife, we should rather make sure that this test world remains open. Don't you think..How sure are you about this for the beta??
Because as I said on another post there were many times that the shutdown requirements of a normal market world were met but nothing happened...
There were two times where a single alliance occupied all wonders and had them for more than 4-5 months (maybe more)
There were many times in the past that you presses the "rank" on the left navigation bar and you could count less than 300 accounts in total (I am sure that I had seen less than 200 about 2 or 3 years ago)
But despite that a count down NEVER started....
So what changed now??????
And what if new players register into server.
Will that stop the countdown??
Well... this might have happened because someone ELSE declared those for them or they have choosen another path to report them i.e. the ticketing system....
After all these years you still think that bugs are reported only in the forum bugs section???
I have have reported bugs under my name that persons from my alliance have found and there were players from pact alliances that had either asked me to report a bug or help them with the translation....
The fact that you do not see a person reporting a bug does not mean that he has not contributed in finding this bug!!!
For example for me to find a bug in an attack I need someone to attack... SO If I find this by attacking @Draba Aspera for example, does not mean that @Draba Aspera has not contributed to finding this bug!!!
not in factAfter all these years you still think that bugs are reported only in the forum bugs section???
and therefore I am looking together with you for reasons that Arci can bring to the discussion with the Hamburg colleagues why this world should not be closed.I guess for myself and after about 10 years experience, they won't stop closing ZZ2
No one is fighting you.... I think you got lost in the translation.... we are looking for the same thing.... I hope @buffysara or @Draba Aspera could explain you the meaning of my message in German as I do not trust google translator to explain it to you....Instead of fighting us down to the last knife, we should rather make sure that this test world remains open. Don't you think..
We all hope for the same...and therefore I am looking together with you for reasons that Arci can bring to the discussion with the Hamburg colleagues why this world should not be closed.
so far we have had no answer if the world is still open, so the certainty they give us is that it will close, better to ask for another special world that takes another 8 years to close, we will discuss configurations, I
4 world speeds
3 troop speed
3 trading speed
no night bonus
25 johadores per alliance end of the Olympus game (with temples across 100 oceans)
3 starting cities
I play Achily world also and as I remember you (innogames) wants to put Achily under WW- we vote no and also as i remember some 90% of players .Then some players told Achily world can be won only if ne alliance conquer all other alliances.Hyperborea and Achilles are special worlds without an endgame.
Therefore, one of the closing conditions can never be met. These worlds remain open until Innogames decides something else.
I play in Finland on a WW world with 7 players.
It's only finished 1 WW. So the world is open.
incidentally, zz2 started on January 24, 2014
by the way Arci
thats wrong, 5 starting cities
I'm not sure yet how it will be implemented as we basically need some development-time to write some code that prevents zz2 from closing.will the countdown start again as soon as the number of active players falls below 300 ?